Class Discussion/ Peer Review

Class Discussion Page 96

2. It is my personal belief that certain parts of the study of consciousness can be considered scientific. Although the concept of consciousness is obviously associated with brain function it lacks certain scientific requirements. Robert Hazen writes this in his article, “For a question to be scientific, it must be answerable through a reproducible process of observation, experiment and theory”. Which leads me to believe that some parts of consciousness is scientific while others are not.
According to Robert Hazen, any study of brain function is deemed scientific. Scientists have the ability to “focus on the mechanics of consciousness”. They can study the human reaction to external stimuli as well as capture brain waves and how it functions. All of these aspects of consciousness are on the scientific spectrum. The problem that falls outside the scope of consciousness is what Hazen describes as “the intangible connections between the physical brain and self-awareness, emotion, perception, and reasoning”. It is this other side of consciousness that cannot be scientifically studied and therefore cannot be considered scientific.
The beliefs of a reductionist are that neurons alone can explain the concept of a thought, idea or emotion. They see anything that involves the brain as being scientifically explainable. On the other hand, there are the skeptics. Skeptics believe the exact opposite, in that there is no way of physically understanding consciousness. I fall in between these two groups believing there is truth to both arguments.



PEER REVIEW

Erin Lyng- Didn’t have Postings for 9/1/09 or 9/3/09

Jade Arneson- I really enjoyed reading your blogs Jade. Not only did you make identifiable points but your writing is easy to follow as well as comprehend. I completely agreed with your view of “self” in regards to the online classroom and liked how you reflected on your previous notions prior to reading Kenneth Gergen’s essay. Your blogs are well thought out and detailed.

Jess Tavizon- Jess, I have to start by saying I love your background, it’s colorful and creative. I also found your writing to be extremely detailed and entertaining. I thought your example of not truly knowing somebody unless you have met them was exceptional. I too would think you were an extrovert had you not clearly explained that you are in fact not. I felt this was a great way to show evidence towards your overall point. Great writing!!!!